ROBERT MUELLLER'S "PROOF" OF "COLLUSION"

Our legal system is bastardized, and weaponized by people of no honor. SO, ROBERT MUELLER, ROGUE PROSECUTOR AND SPECIAL COUNSEL after nearly two years and 10s of millions of dollars, found someone who would tell him the "truth" as he wanted it told. Michael Cohen, with honor similar to that of Mueller, Comey and other DOJ holdovers. None!! A lesson learned for some of us. When  your integrity quotient is zero, when you can look for Russian collusion as proof of a crime for a preordained criminal and can't find it, you can find a substitute in indiscretions of the "criminal." And, "truth" is what you want to hear from whomever you hear it, even one of no honor. Michael Cohen told the "truth" as Mueller wants it. Our legal system is bastardized and weaponized by dishonorable people. There is now no doubt. President Trump made a huge mistake by not firing all DOJ holdovers and AG Sessions was all but inept.

Comments

  1. Anonymous16 December, 2018

    Citing just about anyone as dishonorable in the defense of Donald Trump, that paragon of honor and integrity, is truly laughable. These are just the natural flow of events when the person in question is a dirtball and slimebag, and most probably a sociopath. I guess in your world, character, integrity and honesty don't count, as long as your particular political viewpoint is promoted. Very sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Joe A. Mann16 December, 2018

      What's sad, or more apt disgusting, is that you don't have the courage, or the intellectual integrity, to identify yourself while disparaging me. Oh, what's more telling is that I'm condemning the special counsel, not defending President Trump, but your equation is typical of non-analytical linear thinkers. But, you have a lot of company in your pod. Sad.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own experie
Read more