IMMIGRATION, DEMOCRATS DISHONEST. REPUBLICANS STUPID

A Facebook person accused me of using "talking points" in discussing the ways, and that Democrats dishonesty use immigration to build voter blocs and Republicans have been stuck on stupid and timidity in permitting them to do so. This is my response to the person.

 Jay, I don't know with certainty what you mean with "talking points!" directed at me. However, please know that I don't use talking points, I make them from experience and knowledge. After 35 years experience in Mexico and other lower Americas, as well as involvement in politics since college and the revolutionary days of the 60s-70s, I have an understanding of border issues and how each political party has dealt with the issue(s). Simply stated, Democrats have been dishonest in pursuit of voters and Republicans have been stuck on stupid for permitting them to win the battle. 

 In 2007 I presented a proposal "Immigration and Terrorism "-- Beyond Walls" to President Bush, published it and spoke broadly, in many venues.. BTW, it was presented to Britain's Parliament by people who heard and read it. I dealt with terrorism, which the Brits related to their long-standing problems. Around 2006-2007, the whole issue took a very serious turn and requires action far different from preventing the innocent Hispanic and Latino from coming in for a better life. Far more serious, and that's why the Brits took it to Parliament. 

 The way our government , CONGRESS, is dealing with the issue(s) is scandalous, even treason is not a reach too far. !Think drugs, human trafficking, mid-easterners buying their way through Mexico, Hezbollah now all over the USA and all of both S. and N. America from their base in the Triple Frontier of S. Am. I learned this in 2001, and since then they are everywhere, as one of my blog readers reported, "from Puerto del Fuego to Northern Tip of Canada." 

 YES, this is damn Serious!! Anyone who doesn't internalize this threat when it's presented doesn't want the truth and is happy basking in ignorance. When I reported these facts in the newspaper, a guy who is as abjectly dishonest as he is stupid, rebutted it and called me a liar in public. I think he will never do that again and he will never write for the newspaper again. That's how serious this issue is and I've about given up on our government dealing with the issue either intelligently in the case of Republicans or honestly and objectively with the Democrats. These are my "talking points," Jay. And, there are more.

Comments

  1. Unknown01 January, 2019

    Jay's description of your facts as "talking points" is simply his inability to accept the fact that there are those among us who have thought deeply about issues, and have formed fact-based opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dr. Joe A. Mann02 January, 2019

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own experie
Read more