IMMIGRATION -- PROGRESSIVES DISHONEST, REPUBLICANS STUPID


May I suggest that the fundamental driver of every effort and initiative of the "Progressive" is to effect total control of the determinants of the American Condition, what she will be, hence who we will be, how we live. 

 It cannot be legitimately debated that a major "Progressive" initiative has long been, 8 decades,  to alter the American population to give them controlling voter blocs. Hence, immigrants are at the tip of the spear of their cultural revolution, fighting for their votes to effect transformation of America. While this is clear to any analytical thinker, the "Progressives" often give their strategy away in their speech and actions. To wit, Nancy Pelosi's accusation that "Republicans want only a white population." Dishonesty and stupidity have driven us for decades -- Democrats blatantly dishonest in garnering voter blocs and Republicans stuck on stupidity for permitting them to accomplish their objective. 

 We're at a critical point now. The 2016 election slowed the "Progressives'" efforts, their revolution for transformation, but it is looking doubtful that they will be stopped. This caravan marching to our borders is a part of their strategy. Don't doubt it. Their financiers are funding the march. Multiculturalism, as "Progressives" promote, has failed in other nations, but "Progressives" are winning with it for now here. Please don't equate multiculturalism with immigrant. Early immigrants assimilated, many of today's immigrants do not. Those who do assimilate willingly accept the national conditions that lured them. "Progressives" have learned that discouraging assimilation gives them control of blocs. Republicans are absolutely unwise, and even stupid, for ignoring this, especially with Hispanics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own experie
Read more