FBI'S IG REPORT, COMEY GUILTY, BIAS IGNORED

The DOJ is utterly corrupt. I've been studying their actions since, in 2016, there was a concerted effort to brainwash people with frequent, even continuous, reports by media declaring James Comey, Robert Mueller and even Barack Obama as paragons of virtue, free of scandals and generally quite angelic people. I sorted Comey out for what he was truly up to in May of 2016 and posted on this blog, May 24, 2016, "Hillary Clinton -- No Indictment." It is rather clear that Mr. Mueller is not the paragon of virtue either as he goes far and wide trying to find some evidence to bring President Trump down. I also find the IG's report unconvincing that there was no bias in dealing with Hillary Clinton. Bias screamed out in too many places. I will analyze this more completely when the House reviews are completed. It is clear, however, that the Democrats who have been a part of the questioning, both House and Senate, of the IG are obfuscating to the max. I'm watching the testimonies regarding the FBI IG's investigation of the Comey/Clinton/e-mail case. While yesterday's review focused on James Comey's improper actions in exonerating Clinton it avoided declaring bias, which is all but glaring in the report! Ridiculous! However, they used the standard 4 words that I've written about, "there is no evidence." In this case, apparently Bias did not declare that it was active in the case. Yes! Now, today Trey Gowdy gave a hard-hitting review of the IG report using nothing but sound reasoning regarding Rule of Law and expected propriety not observed by the IG. Then, Congressman Cummings made what I thought was an unbeatable case of obfuscation and transfer of focus away from the intended focus to Trump and to immigration problems. But, Gerald Nadler came on and beat Cummings hands down. Both are working to prove they are worse than the two worst Senators from yesterday's hearing -- Richard Blumenthal and Patrick Leahy. Sickening. I've had my personal battle with Leahy. May report on it. Absolutely disgusting that we have people in government who can perform as poorly as these people, and I'm not willing to view the IG as he is billed!! Gowdy is continuing to discuss the fraud of Strozk and Page. Wow!!! Our DOJ is beyond corrupt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own experie
Read more