AOC DEMOCRATS' USEFUL IDIOT

This is a response to a Facebook discussion of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's contribution to Democrats. Many try to compare her to traditional Democrats. She is not such. "Progressives" are using her to attract those like her to populate their party so as to recover their momentum and their march to perdition -- transformation of America to a lesser nation with parity to others, even 3rd world.

 Folks, I'll suggest that we put aside the metrics by which we've analyzed and equated politicians to for our lifetimes. Gone are the times when political debate was about how honorable people had different philosophies as to how to do best for the largest number of people. The 8-decades long "Progressive" revolution has been all about dictating lifestyle, aka societal change, controlling administrative bureaucracies, and abrogation of all mores that defined America and Americans. Their model of anti-Americanism is established by a few and sold to the masses by the propaganda network. Enough Americans awoke to reality during Obama's reign and elected Trump, not ideal, but the only candidate running not inured to all of the failures of their initiatives, laws they promulgated, lifestyles they established and more. They must reestablish their momentum. SO, THEY INCREASE THEIR RECRUITING of candidates who can increase their numbers of voters. AOC is being used for that purpose with the 90 million millennials as their target. She defeated an "old white man," the antithesis of their model, even though they are controlled by old white people -- NOW. 
AOC and those like her are simply bait, chum for millennial "fish." To view her and the other despicable misfits recently elected as anything like typical Democrats is not advisable. Waste of time. "Progressives" believe they must rebuild their forces NOW --- illegals and 16-year old kids who are indoctrinated in school. AOC is like one of those.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own experie
Read more