DEMOCRATS FIGHT TRUMPS SUCCESS -- WHY?

The short answer to why "Progressives," aka Democrats, fight to stop Trump is that his presidency promises to halt their 8-decades long cultural revolution, aka war, to transform America to a lesser nation. More will be written on this in subsequent posts.
While President Trump's policies are succeeding on several fronts, both nationally and internationally,  "Progressives," aka Democrats, fight his every initiative, even ponder  impeachment. The Trump economic team has rapidly overcome the Obama administration's pathetic economic policies, all of which were antithetical to capital formation, job creation and economic growth. Already 4% quarterly growth has been achieved, and 3.5% annual growth, perhaps more, can be projected confidently. This tops the previous eight years of 2% average annual growth, which  Obama, Larry Summers, their sycophantic media and academic economists proclaimed to be a “new normal. "Greater growth would never be achieved again!" Now, Obama and his minions claim credit for the Trump success. So much for Intellectual integrity, None! But, media hype it and Democrats who rely on the propaganda network buy it confirming their bias with no search for truth.

Internationally, President Trump is making progress where none has been made for some time, even never. Obama's foreign policies were, contrary to the hype from the propaganda network, ineffective and even detrimental to America. "Leading from behind” in N. Africa Obama, James Clapper and Hillary Clinton, supported the so-called “Arab Spring,” which contrary to reports, supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya and Yemen and the radical theocratic ruling Mullahs in Iran, where Obama did not support the Green Revolution, thereby leaving 50 million Persians oppressed. Then he gave Iran billions of dollars – to promote terrorism. Hezbollah, Iran's agents for terrorism, are in many countries, including all of the Americas! Then there is North Korea. Only the antagonistic media and “Progressive” Democrats, who hope for failure, can downplay the work Trump and Pompeo are doing there.
Now, “Progressive” Democrats are doing all possible to defeat Trump. His election halted their 8-decades  long cultural revolution to transform America from the founders' vision to one of their own -- a lesser nation. Their sexual revolution of the 60s with unlimited abortion in 1973, an industry today, is their crowning “achievement.” Colleges and universities, now with 90% “Progressive” activist faculty, have transformed from sanctuaries for learning to havens for left  political activism. Even lower level students are being indoctrinated! Defining tenets of traditional Americanism have been abrogated as has the Rule of Law. Anarchy is encouraged as are violent demonstrations by activists. The DOJ, is corrupted, especially with Obama and AG Holder. Top Intelligence agencies officials are clearly among those corrupted and are also activists for Democrats' agenda to transform America. Societal decadence is profound after 8 decades of "Progressive" cultural revolution. (more in a subsequent post).

The fight to keep Kavanaugh off the SCOTUS is seeking a left-activist court to do the "Progressives"' bidding as has been done since the Warren court and abortion on demand. (More on this in a subsequent post).

Election of a president outside the bounds of the revolutionaries was absolutely necessary in 2016 to stop cultural revolution, a march to perdition! Trump is that person, like him or not. He is working to do the job, but the forces against him are formidable, even warlike. For the sake of our nation,  Americans must fight to stop the revolution by voting in large numbers to defeat the "Progressive" agenda, their cultural revolution to transform America to a lesser nation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more