CHAOS IN WASHINGTON


CHAOS IN WASHINGTON  IS NOT ABOUT TRUMP HIMSELF, RATHER IT'S ALL ABOUT WHAT HIS ELECTION HAS DONE TO STOP THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION OF 8 DECADES.

The chaos and dysfunction we're experiencing in Washington, in government, is not all about President Trump as too many, perhaps even most, believe and the media promote. It is far more about what Trump's election has done to stop the sub-cultural revolutionaries who have been taking control of government for 8 decades and marching the nation to perdition.

Barack Obama was the patron saint of these revolutionaries and Hillary Clinton, long a part of the march, the “Progressive” movement, was to complete the transformation of America, aka the destruction of “traditional America.” This writer hoped and prayed for an election result to stop the sub-cultural revolution. Trump would not have been a first choice, but he is capable of doing the job that must be done. The revolutionaries will fight with every trick they have, honesty and integrity be damned, to avoid losing control and stopping their march.

Anyone who is not inclined to accept this explanation, simply take an objective analytical look at the nation since the 1950s when “Progressives” began their takeover of honorable Democrats. The sexual revolution and military protests of the 1960s put them in control of much of the nation. With some interruptions, such as Reagan years, they have been on a continuous march to perdition with societal decadence a major result. Take a hard look at societal devolution and be honest in doing so.

More to be written about this dilemma. Please consider the definition of “Progressivism” as “any effort to destroy one or more tenets of “traditional America.” 

 The whole effort to protect Hillary Clinton before the 2016 election and the efforts now to bring  Trump down will prove to be the biggest fraud perpetrated upon American people in modern times, perhaps in history.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more