GLOBAL WARMING -- 97% SCIENTISTS' CONSENSUS WRONGLY DERIVED



ORIGIN OF THE 97% "CONSENSUS OF SCIENTISTS" ON GLOBAL WARMING 
(references added at end on o3/24/2013)
The highly promoted mantra that a 97% "consensus of scientists" proves global warming is a critical issue and, even more importantly, is man-made is improperly arrived at and, hence, is invalid. Scientific conclusions and  laws are arrived at not by consensus but from indisputable data and information arrived at by proper use of the "Scientific Method" and statistics. Both were ignored in coming to the "97% consensus" conclusion. It is all but inarguable that politicians co-opted science and "scientists" and both politicized and commercialized the issue called "global warming." With much criticism of the lack of data to prove "global warming, more emphasis now is on "climate change." How was the "97% consensus of scientists derived?" Mr. Roland (Keith) Sadler gives the following explanation.

There were many skeptics from the beginning but their voices were quieted and they were disparaged and discredited. Still are! 
In 1998, Dr. Arthur Robinson, Director of the Oregon Institute for Science and Medicine, posted his first "Global Warming skeptic" petition.
Today, his list includes nearly 32,000 Americans who are skeptics of man-made global warming. All have science qualifications.  More than 9,000 hold PhDs in the sciences. Almost 32,000 thousand skeptics is twelve times as many scientists as the 2,500 scientific reviewers claimed by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to form a "scientific consensus."

This piece of propaganda comes from a 2009 American Geophysical Union  survey. It’s also referred to as the Doran Survey or Zimmerman Thesis. 


"Theory crushed"...Mr. Sadler            But the mantra goes on...JAM

A major issue with a preponderance of "scientific reports" and public focus on global warming, other critical problems are going unresolved. In many years of technical Research and Development I always operated from the tenet that " bad data are worse than no data." Bad data and improper information beg and assure bad decisions. It is a fact!

Roland (Keith) Sadler
Graduate of Christopher Newport University-BS Business Management
25 years of experience in Medical /Science industry
Experience & familiarity  with study designs/formats (experimental design)
Interest in the Global Warming/Climate Change Theory and Anthropogenic effect of such.


Debunking the 97% 'consensus' on global warming | Climate ...

www.climatechangedispatch.com/debunking-the-97-consensus-on-globa...‎
Feb 4, 2014 - The main pillar of the warmist argument is the contention that a "consensus" exists among scientists that global warming is caused by man and ...

About that overwhelming 97-98% number of scientists that say there ...

wattsupwiththat.com/.../about-that-overwhelming-97%...‎
Watts Up With That?
Jul 18, 2012 - So where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly ...

That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not! - Forbes

www.forbes.com/.../that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/‎
Forbes
Jul 17, 2012 - Consensus momentum regarding action on climate change? ... It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) ...... Now, for a survey of what climate scientists (at least 97% of them anyway)















=

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more