Buffett's hypocrisy

Comments

  1. Dr. Joe A. Mann17 August, 2011

    Click here: Review & Outlook: Warren Buffett's Tax Dodge - WSJ.com

    The editorial in WSJ today speaks, in part, to the hypocrisy of Warren Buffett that I wrote in the subject piece, OBAMA AND THE DEBT CEILING, which was published in edited form a week ago. While WSJ's editorial notes even more tax "dodging" than I wrote of in that even his children have foundations to shelter income, they don't come down on him nearly as hard as he deserves. A strong case can be made if Republicans were astute enough (??) that people in Buffett's class are quite disingenuous (being kind here). Ted Turner "shelters" by giving to the United Nations, Soros to a variety of socialist and Marxist "shelters," Peter Lewis (Progressive Ins.) to Marxist organizations......Gates just admitted his billions to "education" have failed.....and the list goes on.
    I made a recommendation to George Allen in a meeting here yesterday to use this and I think we should do a blitz on RNC again and give them some ammo they don't seem to be astute enough to get on their own.

    Just as I was questioning myself as to why I'm taking limited time and energy to deal with this.....Obama comes on TV again and I I'm reminded WHY. He hasn't a clue as to how to deal with the nation's problems. How could he?

    Joe

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more