RACISM LIVES SO BABIES DIE

The Virginia Governor Ralph Northam debacle and Progressive's definition of themselves.


Progressives, aka Democrats, assure that racism lives while babies die! That's their strategy in dealing with the controversy of Virginia Governor Ralph Northam's supporting infanticide. They revive blackface racism of 35 years ago while they ignore his endorsement of late term, even at-birth abortion. WHY? Voter bloc protection! They focus on racism to cement the black voter bloc and ignore at-birth-abortion, infanticide or taking of human life, to satisfy the radical women's voter bloc. They define themselves by doing so as continuing the 8-decade cultural revolution, begun in the '50s, that really rose to prominence with Roe v Wade in 1973.

A bit of explanation for those who may not be totally informed on this issue. The Virginia General Assembly's House of Delegates put up a bill, HB-2491, the essence of which would have permitted extinguishing the life of a baby even at birth, in spite of some typical redefining of words by “Progressives” in an effort to deny the finality of this procedure. Governor Ralph Northam endorsed the bill, supporting the procedure – infanticide, taking a human life! Many people, including myself in a letter posted in this blog, called for Northam to resign immediately. He didn't and hasn't. Some research revealed “blackface” racist photos in his background – 35 years ago. Northam initially accepted them as his but later, in a terribly ineffective news conference, he denied his association with the photos. He vows to remain in office. In the meantime a similar “blackface” incident arises with the AG and a claim of sexual abuse charge against the Lt. Governor two potential replacements complicate the issue if he were to resign. This is a mess, but this article is not to address these two issues, rather it's to focus on why Democrats, en mass, aren't demanding his resignation. Some few are, however. It's the “politic” thing to do! Show some resistance, but not too much. Hang on to the votes.

With the 35-year old blackface photos revealed, Democrats had two reasons to ask for Northam's resignation. But, they did neither. Instead, they decided to use the racism charge positively for them and ignore the infanticide issue. Raise racism again to “prove” they are black-supportive. Why? To cement the voter bloc!! Why do they ignore the infanticide issue? Same, to protect the women's voter bloc, and perhaps some young voters. This is sad and sickening, but frankly has become the expected action. Anything to cement voter blocs is an unspoken, but obvious, goal of “Progressives” Democrats, all Democrats now.

They now define themselves.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more