CUOMO -- CONSERVATIVES NOT WELCOME IN NEW YORK


This post by Dr. Robert Warren, whom readers know from previous insightful posts, addresses an issue that must not be ignored or downplayed. When a head of state, in this case Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, declares that much of the states population (conservatives) is not welcome in the state, he must be held accountable. How? The citizens of New York should take means to remove him from office immediately. Of course, that's not likely to happen. Unfortunately, this is but one more "sign of our times" as the far-left Progressives, who have taken over the Democratic Party, dominate and transform America as Barack Obama promised he'd do. He has much help from people like Cuomo. Wake up, Americans. We no longer have a traditional Democratic Party. Radical Progressives have been gnawing away at traditional America since the 1960s and now have control.
-- jam, ed

THE RISE OF TYRANNY IN AMERICA
By Dr. Robert Warren, PhD

The constant attacks by progressives on the American Constitution are unrelenting. Regardless of who you are, unless you are in lock step with the current fads of the progressive movement, you are a second-class citizen. Below are the words of the current Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo:

“Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and if they are the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.

There could be no clearer statement of progressive tyranny. It reminds me of Hitler and his demeaning of the German Jewish population prior to their internment and genocidal slaughter. One wonders when Cuomo will get out the NAZI playbook and start requiring conservatives to wear special insignia on their clothing to identify themselves. Looking FORWARD, his next step would be to control their behavior and seize their property, particularly their means of self-defense. Would jail be out of the question? Or forced relocation outside the state? Those who think that this is silly might actually want to look at some current US news.

Now let’s look at those Americans whom Cuomo is attacking. First, people who believe in the sanctity of life are somehow to be condemned. Apparently, the Catholic Church, among others, is unwelcome. Second, people who believe in the right of self-defense are considered extreme even though police forces around the country are experiencing major budget cuts. Third, people who believe in the sanctity of marriage and see danger to the family and the culture are deemed to have some type of incurable and dangerous phobia.

Personally, I intend to avoid New York and New York City for the foreseeable future. Since I am unwelcome, I can only conclude that my money is unwelcome. Cuomo’s statements seem idiotic in light of the fact that New York is advertising for businesses to move to the State because of it’s welcoming nature. (I think Cuomo must have meant only progressive businesses, if there are any.) Finally, it really makes sense for conservatives and, for that matter those who think the Constitution still matters, to move out of New York before the roundup of the undesirables occurs.

To quote Hitler, “Anyone who sees and paints a sky green and fields blue ought to be sterilized.” I’m guessing that is the final solution for conservative New Yorkers.

Ed. JAM

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

I apologize for the structure of the post below, with no segmentation, but the system refuses to do it my way. To my post yesterday re AMR's chapter 11 filing relating my experiences over many years flying with AA, an AA pilot wrote a thoughtful comment that caused me to think a bit more about the precursors to conditions of their bankruptcy. Frankly, I have what is perhaps too much experience with trade unions and their excesses, but know less about others such as the airlines. After learning more about the negotiations of AA with their unions, I now think it's justifiable to post the comments below. I've seen too many industries destroyed by union excesses coupled with management incompetence in caving to excess demands. Start with coal (dead for many years), steel, textiles, shoes, electronics manufacturing, and more.  The Detroit 3 (once the big 3) deserves special mention. As their costs rose to $72/hour (fully loaded) and costs in the southern industry w...
Read more

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

"Trying to persuade a prejudiced mind is as Sisyphean as trying to open a closed mind is Quixotic." Mann, May 2012 In a blog post herein below on May 1, 2013, I outlined what we who manage people and enterprises know as absolutes about performances of people who are put into management and supervisory positions for which they haven't requisite qualifications. For those who have progressed through several jobs to their level of incompetence, this is known as the Peter Principle as defined by Laurence J. Peter. In all likelihood, all who have managed people for any length of time have seen this principle played out. While Peter's observation applies to progression through multiple job levels, if a person is put into any job for which he is unqualified, the concept is also valid. Elective political positions is where I see this most often played out. The election of Barack Obama as President of the United States is the most significant example of this in my lif...
Read more

ETHANOL -- The worst mandate ever gets even worse

When politicians get control of science and the inept or dishonest scientists, nothing good comes of it. There are many examples -- global warming (aka climate change) is the most prominent. The ethanol mandate, although a part of the climate change mania, stands on its own as arguably the most ridiculous mandate of all time. President Jimmy Carter, who was influenced by a misguided college professor, can be charged with the mistake of promulgating the ethanol mandate.  Of course, Al Gore is the politician who played the global warming issue like a drum and has benefited financially from it. Use of ethanol in motor fuel is not a net positive either in costs or in impact on the environment.... enormous hype to the contrary notwithstanding. Ethanol does not have the positive effect on the environment as touted. It has only about 60% of the specific energy of petroleum fuel, which begs use of more fuel to achieve the same energy as petroleum fuel. And, so it does. I have my own exp...
Read more