Mann to Man

The congressional review of FBI's IG report on investigation of Clinton's e-mail scam has brought more than just Clinton's e-mail abuse of policy into focus. It is all but clear that the Mueller's so-called Russian collusion investigation was preconceived to undo the 2016 election that promised (still promises) to stop the 8-decades long revolution to transform America.   So IG Horowitz is reviewing FBI's Peter Strzok's text messages to and from lawyer Lisa Page, reported as his paramour. WHY? Are the messages not clear? Strzok asserted that Trump should lose by millions of votes margin. In responding to Page's frantic hopes that Trump will not be elected Strzok assured her no, no, no that they must stop him. Then to me the clincher. He asserted they had an "Insurance policy against that happening!!" There has been much tossing and turning by biased media as to what that meant. STRZOK BECAME THE PROMOTER OF THE MUELLER SEARCH FOR RUSSIAN COLLUSIO...

The DOJ is utterly corrupt. I've been studying their actions since, in 2016, there was a concerted effort to brainwash people with frequent, even continuous, reports by media declaring James Comey, Robert Mueller and even Barack Obama as paragons of virtue, free of scandals and generally quite angelic people. I sorted Comey out for what he was truly up to in May of 2016 and posted on this blog, May 24, 2016, "Hillary Clinton -- No Indictment." It is rather clear that Mr. Mueller is not the paragon of virtue either as he goes far and wide trying to find some evidence to bring President Trump down. I also find the IG's report unconvincing that there was no bias in dealing with Hillary Clinton. Bias screamed out in too many places. I will analyze this more completely when the House reviews are completed. It is clear, however, that the Democrats who have been a part of the questioning, both House and Senate, of the IG are obfuscating to the max. I'm watching the tes...

Democrats are now trying to sell negative for Trump saying that Kim has "won" the summit because Trump has elevated him to a top world leader. This is nothing but an attempt to protect Barack Obama from criticism for the failure of his "strategic patience" strategy, that wasn't a strategy at all, in the event that the summit is successful, even in slight degree. How dishonest can they be? It is absolutely infuriating to listen to the ridiculous characterizations of the Trump/Kim summit by the utterly dishonest shills for the worst of the "Progressive" Democrats, especially in covering for arguably the worst president of our time, Barack Obama, who was/is not pro-America at all. Shill Mary Ann Marsh is now asserting that Kim is already the winner of the summit because he gets credibility by Trump elevating him to top leader status by meeting with him. For God's sake!!! How low can they go? This is a not-even-slightly-veiled defense of Obama by att...

                                  PROTECTING STUDENTS FROM SHOOTINGS                                                    First Three Steps                     By Alexandra (Alex) Woloszyn, student I n the past year, the issue of gun control and gun violence has plagued the nation, most commonly, in the form of school shootings. On February 14 th , 2018, a 19-year-old shooter killed 17 people and wounded 17 more. Most recently, May 18 th , Santa Fe High School experienced the same tragic event. Since the 2017-18 school year has started, 23 shootings have taken place. One would think after three instances that federal action would take action. The shooting at Parkland should have been the deciding factor. It seems that t...