RUSSIA COLLUSION "D or R"?

RUSSIAN COLLUSION AND DEMOCRATS

Several weeks ago I wrote to friends on Facebook asking, somewhat rhetorically, what would happen when the “Russian-Trump Collusion Investigation” forced focus on Democrats, Clinton(s), the Obama DOJ and others of the “Deep State,” including Comey and Mueller. What would happen? Would it be reported or covered up? Who would report it? Well, it's happened and those expected to be questioned as perpetrators and accomplices are already parsing words, denying what would appear to be obvious, lying and looking for cover. The four most common words, written about here in the past, “there is no evidence,” are falling from the tongue of Clinton, DNC operatives and others. Those words have been prominently used since the sub-cultural revolution abrogated the absolutes of ethics and morals and of what's right and what's wrong to focus on what can be deemed legal. What can we expect now?

The Wall Street Journal's Kimberly Strassel wrote an op-ed today that outlines the problem. The DNC and the Clinton campaign and all of their operatives must now be viewed as ones responsible for the Russian-Trump “collusion” investigation. I have thought from the initiation of the investigation that this is typical “projectiion,” but the worst of it. As I have written before, unfortunately today's “Progressive” Democrats have become masters, professionals, at using the technique, none better than the Clintons. What is “projection?” It's simply assigning ones own activities, especially sins, transgressions, wrong-doings of all sorts to the opposition. From the get-go I've thought this is what the “Deep State” operators are doing with the claims of Russian-Trump collusion.

I must remain skeptical of the investigation led by Robert Mueller as I was of James Comey. Just as I didn't accept the praise heaped upon Comey and wrote accurately on May 21, 2016 that he would exonerate Clinton and how he would do it, I am equally skeptical of the Mueller investigation. I've assumed that Mueller will indict one or more people and I still think his target is Trump. Hopefully, the issue will soon be resolved with the focus now on the Democrats as the “owners” of the Russian-Trump collusion that I choose to call a diversion from their own complicity in what could be criminal action. But, I will not be surprised if Mueller plows on to get PresidentTrump.

I would hope all of this nation-damaging activity can be settled soon, with resolution of who is responsible for what. HOWEVER, suddenly we have the 54-year old JFK assassination now flooding the media. Why now? I want that resolution also, but will it be done correctly – fairly and honestly?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LEFTIST MIND-SET OF TODAY -- REFLEXIVE, THOUGHTLESS SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

AMERICAN AIRLINES -- MORE ABOUT UNIONS AND CH 11

OBAMA -- INEPT OR DELIBERATELY DESTROYING TRADITIONAL AMERICA