SCOTUS justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is obligated to recuse herself in the case of SCOTUS vs Potus' temporary ban on immigrants from 6 nations. If she does not recuse or retire, she may be a party to the abrogation of the Rule of Law as others have.
If Justice Ginsberg has any honor, she will recuse herself from the case of "Circuit Courts vs. Trump's "temporary travel ban" (improperly named but is what it is). If she does not recuse herself, or retire, she will put herself in the same pod, bubble, clan or whatever, as those who threatened to leave the USA if Trump were to be elected -- so-called celebrities and other "entitled miscreants." This puts Justice Ginsberg in the company of Rosey O'Donnell, Al Sharpton, and more radical leftist radical people.
America is already in a state, a condition, when it can be argued legitimately that lower courts are excessively partisan left and are, in fact, enemies to those of more conservative persuasion, aka traditional Americans.
For many decades, America has been led by so-called "Progressive" policies that can legitimatelybe said to often violate the US Constitution. The Obama DOJs under both AG Holder and AG Lynch, were guilty, not only of such violations but of abrogating the very Rule of Law, as the Lynch/Comey/Bill Clinton/ Hillary Clinton fiasco exemplifies. Comey's stepping beyond his roll as FBI investigator and exonerating Hillary Clinton of many violations is such an example. His acting as a prosecutor and his taking the decision for a Clinton indictment out of the purview of the AG abrogates the Rule of Law.
The Rule of Law is the fundamental underpinning of a 1st World state. Abrogation of it leads us to 3rd World.